Is one consequence of using READ_COMMITTED_SNAPSHOT
that the size of the temp db will grow much larger, since sql will keep transaction details in tempdb ?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tcbchxcb(v=vs.110).aspx
I think by default, sql uses pessimistic locking, which can lead to blocking
http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2013/01/implementing-snapshot-or-read-committed-snapshot-isolation-in-sql-server-a-guide/
I want to turn on this setting, but want to know all the possible consequences.
What other things could be impacted?